Versions Compared

Old Version 8

changes.mady.by.user Aurore Bussalb (Unlicensed)

Saved on

compared with

New Version 9

changes.mady.by.user Aurore Bussalb (Unlicensed)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Message sent to

Date

Commentary

Answer

eeglablist@sccn.ucsd.edu

fieldtrip@science.ru.nl

I had to subscribe to the mailing list

  • see https://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/workshop/madrid2019/tutorial_erp/#inspect-cleaned-data

  • “Alors pour les fonctions fieldtrip, la chose qui pourrait le plus se rapprocher de ce que tu me demandes serait un score de variance où tu pourrais définir un seuil (ex: 3x la variance) à partir duquel tu considères un trial/canal bruité. L'idée de partir du ft_rejectvisual en te permettant d'automatiser le quality check.”

  • “Pour ce qui est de la détection d'artefacts, si tu as des signaux BIOs (ex: EOG/EMG/ECG), tu pourrais lancer une ICA et partir sur un score de corrélation entre les composantes et ces signaux BIOs pour identifier automatiquement les composantes à retirer.”

https://neuroimage.usc.edu/forums/

Maybe ask directly Guio

mne_analysis@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

Max has sent an email (not exactly the same as above), but maybe ask on the forum instead

In Gonzalez-Moreno et al., 2014, a SNR was computed to compare the quality of artifact correction by MaxFilter SSS and Maxfiter tSSS. Maybe in our case we could compute a SNR before and after Maxfilter? It would be better if this step is an App. This App would take in input the .fif file before MaxFilter and the .fif file after MaxFilter and would return a report.